17
edits
Difference between revisions of "Deleuze"
→Affect Theory
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Because Deleuze thinks that the subject is inherently insatiable, instability follows as a bad thing. There are a few different ways to justify this. One is an impact justified way: stability has been used to justify oppression, i.e. when you definitively say there is something that is, you also invent the concept of what isn’t, which creates in and out groups. Another way to justify this is that stability goes against the fundamental nature of subjects and prevents them from being able to make meaningful relationships with the world i.e. pursue their affect. | Because Deleuze thinks that the subject is inherently insatiable, instability follows as a bad thing. There are a few different ways to justify this. One is an impact justified way: stability has been used to justify oppression, i.e. when you definitively say there is something that is, you also invent the concept of what isn’t, which creates in and out groups. Another way to justify this is that stability goes against the fundamental nature of subjects and prevents them from being able to make meaningful relationships with the world i.e. pursue their affect. | ||
=== Terms === | |||
Nomadology | |||
Becoming | |||
Desire | |||
Multiplicity: Multiplicity is something that cannot change in number without changing in nature, i.e. it represents a Qualitative difference rather than a Quantitative one. | |||
=== Affect Theory === | === Affect Theory === | ||
Affect is a term central to deleuzian theory (or at least, how it’s read in debate) and means our emotions and experiences. | Affect is a term central to deleuzian theory (or at least, how it’s read in debate) and means our emotions and experiences. | ||
| Line 18: | Line 30: | ||
Something important to note is that affect itself is a neutral thing. Certain standard texts/ROBs/Frameworks can say things like active affect are more desirable, but affect itself is just a result of change and experiencing. | Something important to note is that affect itself is a neutral thing. Certain standard texts/ROBs/Frameworks can say things like active affect are more desirable, but affect itself is just a result of change and experiencing. | ||
'''<big>Rhizomes</big>''' | '''<big>Rhizomes</big>''' | ||
| Line 151: | Line 151: | ||
- Deleuze and Guattari is usually shortened to DnG or dng | - Deleuze and Guattari is usually shortened to DnG or dng | ||
-Good Deleuze Debaters include | -Good Deleuze Debaters include | ||
* Lake Highland Prep Harris Layson | * Lake Highland Prep Harris Layson | ||
| Line 158: | Line 157: | ||
* Westlake Alex Coulter | * Westlake Alex Coulter | ||
== Recommended Articles to Get Started with Deleuze == | == Recommended Articles to Get Started with Deleuze == | ||
Deleuze and/or Guattari are one of the more challenging philosophies to understand-its not recommended to get into it unless you already have a good grasp of other philosophical concepts. In short, Deleuze should NOT be the first philosopher you read. Below in order of level of reading: | Deleuze and/or Guattari are one of the more challenging philosophies to understand-its not recommended to get into it unless you already have a good grasp of other philosophical concepts. In short, Deleuze should NOT be the first philosopher you read. Below in order of level of reading: | ||