1,166
edits
Difference between revisions of "Responding to Kritiks"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Policy vs Ks == | == Policy vs Ks == | ||
This section is designated as a high priority that is incomplete. If you are able, please contribute to this section. | |||
== Phil vs Ks == | == Phil vs Ks == | ||
== Permutations == | == Permutations == | ||
| Line 12: | Line 14: | ||
'''Permutation double bind''': This is considered a more “tricky” permutation. The text of the permutation usually is: “permutation do the aff and then the alternative in all other instances, either a] the alt is strong enough to solve for the links in which case we can do the aff, or b] the alt is too weak in which case we shouldn’t do it. | '''Permutation double bind''': This is considered a more “tricky” permutation. The text of the permutation usually is: “permutation do the aff and then the alternative in all other instances, either a] the alt is strong enough to solve for the links in which case we can do the aff, or b] the alt is too weak in which case we shouldn’t do it. | ||
'''Severance Permutation''': This is also considered a more “tricky” permutation. It argues that the affirmative will sever out of some part/all of their aff in conjunction with doing the alternative. | '''Severance Permutation''': This is also considered a more “tricky” permutation. It argues that the affirmative will sever out of some part/all of their aff in conjunction with doing the alternative. | ||
=== Miscellaneous notes about permutations === | === Miscellaneous notes about permutations === | ||
* a common answer to permutations is that the link(s) of the kritik is a disad to all permutations | * a common answer to permutations is that the link(s) of the kritik is a disad to all permutations | ||
* most people shorten alternative to “alt” and permutation to “perm” | * most people shorten alternative to “alt” and permutation to “perm” | ||