Responding to Kritiks
Policy vs Ks
This section is designated as a high priority that is incomplete. If you are able, please contribute to this section.
Phil vs Ks
A permutation is an argument in debate which is used to respond to some sort of alternate method/plan proposed by the negative debater (counterplans and kritik alternatives). Permutations can either be a test of competition or a reason to vote affirmative. In order for permutations to be a reason to vote affirmative, they must have a net benefit, i.e. some reason as to why doing the aff and the neg’s alternative is a good idea.
Types of permutations
Permutation do both: One of the most standard types of permutations; it just means that you can do both the affirmative and the kritik alternative at the same time.
Sequencing permutation: A permutation which argues that it is necessary to do the affirmative and then the alternative.
Permutation do the aff in the mindset of the alternative: This permutation is usually read against alternatives which suggest some sort of shift in mindset and suggests passing the aff with the mindset shift of the alternative.
Permutation double bind: This is considered a more “tricky” permutation. The text of the permutation usually is: “permutation do the aff and then the alternative in all other instances, either a] the alt is strong enough to solve for the links in which case we can do the aff, or b] the alt is too weak in which case we shouldn’t do it.
Severance Permutation: This is also considered a more “tricky” permutation. It argues that the affirmative will sever out of some part/all of their aff in conjunction with doing the alternative.
Miscellaneous notes about permutations
- a common answer to permutations is that the link(s) of the kritik is a disad to all permutations
- most people shorten alternative to “alt” and permutation to “perm”