25
edits
Difference between revisions of "Granada Hills AS (Ayush Saha)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Granada Hills AS (Ayush Saha) (view source)
Revision as of 18:10, 11 February 2020
, 18:10, 11 February 2020no edit summary
Ayush Saha (talk | contribs) |
Ayush Saha (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I will post all my stuff when the season ends. There is a bunch of juicy stuff in here. | I will post all my stuff when the season ends. There is a bunch of juicy stuff in here. | ||
<big>AFF | <big>AFF</big> | ||
[[Media:JF-ILAW AC.docx|JF-ILAW AC.docx]] Hahaha ILAW. Such a funny aff, I read this for most of jan feb. Read it all of peninsula and most of HWL. Really funny aff and the UV is stacked with hella args. Usually I don't collapse to ILAW in the 2ar, but if I do, I would read epistemic modesty and say the case outweighs b/c violations are infinitely bad- it's in the 1ar stuff. This aff also has hella skep triggers and some funny warrants. It worked well but not as well as I hoped but I'm also on the west coast so it's a rip. 1AR stuff was written by me | [[Media:JF-ILAW AC.docx|JF-ILAW AC.docx]] Hahaha ILAW. Such a funny aff, I read this for most of jan feb. Read it all of peninsula and most of HWL. Really funny aff and the UV is stacked with hella args. Usually I don't collapse to ILAW in the 2ar, but if I do, I would read epistemic modesty and say the case outweighs b/c violations are infinitely bad- it's in the 1ar stuff. This aff also has hella skep triggers and some funny warrants. It worked well but not as well as I hoped but I'm also on the west coast so it's a rip. 1AR stuff was written by me | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Read the Non naturalism aff on my wiki for Stanford and literally nobody could respond to it. It's on my wiki OS w/o analytics b/c I didn't cut the aff so I won't upload it. But damn that aff was fun af to read and K judges loved the aff. | Read the Non naturalism aff on my wiki for Stanford and literally nobody could respond to it. It's on my wiki OS w/o analytics b/c I didn't cut the aff so I won't upload it. But damn that aff was fun af to read and K judges loved the aff. | ||
<big>NEG</ | <big>NEG</big> | ||
[[Media:JF-Subjective Idealism NC.docx|JF-Subjective Idealism NC.docx]] This was by far my favorite NC to read. I'm 8-1 with this NC (low-key should be 9-0 but oh well) It can and will work on any topic. It's just so obscure people don't know how to respond to it. It will also respond to non-T aff. The trick with this NC is to pair it with truth testing, but if you are losing that flow, the 2NR overview is written out so that you can go for it as an epistemology indict that negates absent a ROTB b/c 10/10 they conceded epistemology first MUAHAHAHA. If you do decide to read this NC, I highly suggest you read the Ellis article in the NC because you wanna be able to explain this in cross. It was my trap card against any aff. Use it responsibly haha. | [[Media:JF-Subjective Idealism NC.docx|JF-Subjective Idealism NC.docx]] This was by far my favorite NC to read. I'm 8-1 with this NC (low-key should be 9-0 but oh well) It can and will work on any topic. It's just so obscure people don't know how to respond to it. It will also respond to non-T aff. The trick with this NC is to pair it with truth testing, but if you are losing that flow, the 2NR overview is written out so that you can go for it as an epistemology indict that negates absent a ROTB b/c 10/10 they conceded epistemology first MUAHAHAHA. If you do decide to read this NC, I highly suggest you read the Ellis article in the NC because you wanna be able to explain this in cross. It was my trap card against any aff. Use it responsibly haha. | ||