25
edits
Difference between revisions of "Granada Hills AS (Ayush Saha)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Granada Hills AS (Ayush Saha) (view source)
Revision as of 17:45, 11 February 2020
, 17:45, 11 February 2020no edit summary
Ayush Saha (talk | contribs) |
Ayush Saha (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
NEG | NEG | ||
[[Media:JF-Subjective Idealism NC.docx|JF-Subjective Idealism NC.docx]] This was by far my favorite NC to read. I'm 7-1 with this NC (low-key should be 8-0 but oh well) It can and will work on any topic. It's just so obscure people don't know how to respond to it. It will also respond to non-T aff. The trick with this NC is to pair it with truth testing, but if you are losing that flow, the 2NR overview is written out so that you can go for it as an epistemology indict. If you do decide to read this NC, I highly suggest you read the Ellis article in the NC because you wanna be able to explain this in cross. It was my trap card against any aff. Use it responsibly haha. | [[Media:JF-Subjective Idealism NC.docx|JF-Subjective Idealism NC.docx]] This was by far my favorite NC to read. I'm 7-1 with this NC (low-key should be 8-0 but oh well) It can and will work on any topic. It's just so obscure people don't know how to respond to it. It will also respond to non-T aff. The trick with this NC is to pair it with truth testing, but if you are losing that flow, the 2NR overview is written out so that you can go for it as an epistemology indict that negates absent a ROTB b/c 10/10 they conceded epistemology first MUAHAHAHA. If you do decide to read this NC, I highly suggest you read the Ellis article in the NC because you wanna be able to explain this in cross. It was my trap card against any aff. Use it responsibly haha. | ||
[[Media:JF-Truth Testing NC.docx|JF-Truth Testing NC.docx]] The best role of the ballot. Let's be real. Was a charmer, I wrote out all the extension but it could be better, but this is what I read. I suggest you drill out comparative world answers so you don't have to waste prep using the answers here. | |||
[[Media:JF Benatar K.docx|JF Benatar K.docx]] LOVE BENATAR. So strategic. I didn't larp or do topic prep so I didn't know how to link turn most affs and stuff like that. So you pull out this bad boy and impact turn the aff and it's ggs. You don't have to interact on case. Against HWL's ICBMS aff I didn't even look at the aff, but as soon as I saw extinction I threw this in the speech doc. Spent maybe 10 seconds on case in the 1NC? 2NR was a NC and Benatar. It's fire because you just gotta prep out this one file and you can beat any extinction aff under UTIL on an impact turn. They will have to read generic answers and they won't get to use their frontlines. ALSO DO NOT DOUBLE TURN YOURSELF MY GOD LOL. I've won on this NC quite a bit, but also messed up sometimes. Oveerall really good time investment. I say you should cut this down to 2 cards as an impact turn and spread it on case. | |||
[[Media:JF-Monism NC.docx|JF-Monism NC.docx]] Pretty comedic NC. Easy to respond to if you have any knowledge of calculus. But I've read this twice in my career. Once on Military aid jan feb and once at peninsula. Works well against the K, again upLAYER with the metaphysics card and preclude the aff. | |||
[[Media:JF-Skep NC.docx|JF-Skep NC.docx]] Been meaning to break it but never did. I read skep at states against a trad kid and that's about it (I broke at CHSSA on it LMFAO). I never read it because well it's the west coast. I also like reading the weird Phil NC's because [1] they have skep triggers in it so if I really wanna go for it I can [2] everybody has generic answers to skep they can blitz in the 1ar, but who has responses to subjective idealism LMFAO. My trick was making sure these kids got off the script haha. | |||