Difference between revisions of "Interlake MW (Megan Wu)"

Latest revision as of 18:47, 2 April 2021

hey, i'm megan! i debated for interlake (in washington state) from 2015-2019, debated on the circuit for 2.5 years, and qualified to the toc as a senior.

i had things on here but took them off because i'm not okay with nsd being advertised on this website.

if you are a small school/independent debater and want to see the files i had posted, send me an email at [email protected]. here are the things i'd posted:

benhabib plan ac from so18
butler plan ac from jf19
markovits kant-ish ac from toc 19
rousseau ac from jf 18
sen ac from alta 17
at nebel t from so18
theory at westview
bierria k (i never got to read it but it's great)
white house reporter pic from so18
my nebel t masterfile
must spec court ruling vs hwl court aff so18

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-hey, i'm megan! i debated for interlake (in wa state) from 2015-2016, and debated on the circuit for 2.5 years. i took the most pride in cutting new frameworks and developing t/theory positions, so here are my favorite positions i wrote over the years. ''if you are a small school/independent debater'' and have questions about debating without institutional support/any position i have up here, feel free to reach out on facebook.
+hey, i'm megan! i debated for interlake (in washington state) from 2015-2019, debated on the circuit for 2.5 years, and qualified to the toc as a senior.
-thanks also to xave, katherine, and kris for invaluable help and guidance throughout my career & with many of these arguments.
+i had things on here but took them off because i'm not okay with nsd being advertised on this website.
-===== aff cases =====
+''if you are a small school/independent debater'' and want to see the files i had posted, send me an email at [email protected]. here are the things i'd posted:
-posting these mostly because i'm proud of the frameworks i cut--i don't expect the topical offense to be very useful! i always put a lot of work into cutting aff cases, insisted on cutting my own affs, and cared a lot about their frameworks. in chronological order:
-[[Media:CD AC - Sen (Alta 2017).docx|CD AC - Sen (Alta 2017).docx]]
+* benhabib plan ac from so18
-* sen fw about evaluative spaces.
+* butler plan ac from jf19
-* especially proud of the positive feedback loop argument in c3.
+* markovits kant-ish ac from toc 19
-* this is the aff that got me my first w30 in a circuit round, so it holds a special place in my heart :)
+* rousseau ac from jf 18
-* i also think that womens' education is super important and a really worthwhile cause w/ respect to solving virtually every global issue, like political stability/curing diseases/fighting climate change!
+* sen ac from alta 17
+* at nebel t from so18
-[[Media:CD AC - Rousseau (JF18).docx|CD AC - Rousseau (JF18).docx]]
+* theory at westview
-* used this framework a LOT throughout my years on the circuit--it's [[Interlake AL (Alisa Liu)|alisa's]].
+* bierria k (i never got to read it but it's great)
-* something to note is that we made sure to diversify the contention offense so that we could develop multiple sources of offense versus any neg strat that was read.
+* white house reporter pic from so18
+* my nebel t masterfile
-[[Media:CD AC - Benhabib (SO18).docx|CD AC - Benhabib (SO18).docx]]
+* must spec court ruling vs hwl court aff so18
-* huge fan of seyla benhabib's work & in my opinion, there's virtually no philosopher who gets more right than she does
-* thanks to john for help with the plan and contention offense.
-[[Media:CD AC - Butler (JF19).docx|CD AC - Butler (JF19).docx]]
-* the aff i read for all of jan-feb, except the toc.
-* i cut a util version of this aff too and read it intermittently, but i'm prouder of the butler framework and enjoyed defending it more.
-[[Media:CD AC - Markovits (JF19).docx|CD AC - Markovits (JF19).docx]]
-* cut a new aff for toc--i wanted to read a deontological aff because i'd somehow never done that, but wanted to write a new framework
-* my internship prof. and i had talked about nomy arpaly's book and i found julia markovits through researching kantian applications of nomy arpaly's work on praiseworthiness/motivational internalism.
-* i think it's very cool that the authors in the framework are all women philosophers with innovative, modern rereadings of kant!!
-===== misc. things =====
-[[Media:CD AT Nebel (SO18).docx|CD AT Nebel (SO18).docx]]
-* answers to nebel specific to my septoct benhabib aff.
-* particularly proud of the link turn to limits and incorporation of framework debate into the second standard of the ci :)
-[[Media:CD AT Westview RS Benhabib FW.docx|CD AT Westview RS Benhabib FW.docx]]
-* got bored one day and wrote a theoretical response to rohith's benhabib fw.
-[[Media:CD K - Bierria.docx|CD K - Bierria.docx]]
-* thanks to prof. marshall for inviting me to see prof. bierria speak! & thanks to prof. bierria for a fantastic talk.
-* interacts well with kantian positions & bierria's theory of power has strong overlap with butler--i think this could definitely be used as a perm card that explains the interaction between butler & a race k.
-[[Media:CD PIC - White House (SO18).docx|CD PIC - White House (SO18).docx]]
-* white house pic on reporters topic
-* not really re-useable--but should be an okay example of what a pic is, what my frontlines looked like, and how i extended pics in the 2nr.
-* thanks to john for helping w/ this one too!
-[[Media:CD Th - Must Spec Court Ruling (SO18 vs HWL).docx|CD Th - Must Spec Court Ruling (SO18 vs HWL).docx]]
-* kris' idea, but i wrote this shell and read it against harvard westlake's scotus aff in septoct senior year.
-* the general idea is that if affs spec scotus, they should spec the reasoning that justices use because the *actual* consequences of judicial rulings come from the reasoning & language used in courts' decisions.

Difference between revisions of "Interlake MW (Megan Wu)"

Latest revision as of 18:47, 2 April 2021

Navigation menu

Search