18
edits
Difference between revisions of "Kritiks"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Added explanation of Link, Impact, Alternative, and Role of the Ballot
m (Noted that Lacan was not a part of the postmodern intellectual movement, as Psychoanalysis was incorrectly labeled as "postmodern") |
(Added explanation of Link, Impact, Alternative, and Role of the Ballot) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
=== Structure of Kritiks === | === Structure of Kritiks === | ||
All kritiks, no matter their literature base, follow a similar form. They start with the [[Structure_of_Kritiks#Link|link]], which isolates the specific issue with the affirmative's orientation, followed by the [[Structure_of_Kritiks#Impact|impact]], which explains the problem with that orientation, ending with the [[Structure_of_Kritiks#Alternative|alternative]], which proposes an alternative strategy which avoids the affirmative's problem. Some kritiks also include a specific [[Structure_of_Kritiks#Role_of_the_Ballot|role of the ballot]] to tell the judge how they should be making their decision. | All kritiks, no matter their literature base, follow a similar form. They start with the [[Structure_of_Kritiks#Link|link]], which isolates the specific issue with the affirmative's orientation, followed by the [[Structure_of_Kritiks#Impact|impact]], which explains the problem with that orientation, ending with the [[Structure_of_Kritiks#Alternative|alternative]], which proposes an alternative strategy which avoids the affirmative's problem. Some kritiks also include a specific [[Structure_of_Kritiks#Role_of_the_Ballot|role of the ballot]] to tell the judge how they should be making their decision. | ||
==== Link ==== | |||
The first part of the Kritik is the link. Most often, the link questions the epistemology, assumptions, or orientation of the affirmative. In rare cases, the link will be to the consequences of the affirmative, but links to the consequences of the affirmative are usually used in disadvantages. | |||
An example of a link for the Capitalism Kritik on the January-February 2025 topic could be that becoming party to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) reifies capitalism because an assumption of the affirmative is that Exclusive Economic Zones, which are a part of UNCLOS and where countries have the right to extract resources for their own ends, are capitalist because they treat the ocean as an economic resource. | |||
==== Impact ==== | |||
The second part of the Kritik, is the impact which explains the impact to the harmful epistemology, assumptions, or orientation of the affirmative. Moreover, these impacts have the potential to "turn" the affirmative by making it difficult or sometimes impossible for the affirmative to solve their impacts. | |||
An example of an impact to the Capitalism Kritik could be that capitalism causes global warming because capitalism does not hold companies accountable for pollution and incentivizes destroying the environment because it is profitable to do so. | |||
This example have the ability to "turn" an affirmative that claims to solve the environment because absent solving capitalism environmental destruction is inevitable. | |||
==== Alternative ==== | |||
The alternative is an advocacy that the negative forwards to solve the links and impacts that they have forwarded above. | |||
An example of an alternative to the Capitalism Kritik is an alternative that advocates for a communist revolution. Explanations of alternatives most often require an explanation of what they do and how they solve the links and impacts of the Kritik. For example, the negative would claim that a communist revolution would entail overthrowing capitalist structures like corporations which would resolve the link and impact arguments because corporations would no longer be around to cause global warming. | |||
==== Role of the Ballot/Role of the Judge/Framework ==== | |||
Role of the Ballot, Role of the Judge or Framework (distinct from Philosophical Framework), is an argument about how the judge should evaluate the round. | |||
Often times, framework is necessary to make the alternative mutually exclusive with the affirmative. A common argument that affirmatives will deploy is the "Permutation double bind" where they argue that we can do both the affirmative and the alternative because if the alternative can rectify a list of problems in the status quo, then it should also be able to rectify the links of the affirmative. Framework can answer the permutation double bind because if the negative makes an argument that we should be held responsible for the assumptions, epistemologies, and orientations that we forward, then we cannot do both the affirmative and the alternative because the affirmative's problematic assumptions are incompatible with the alternative. | |||
=== Responding to Kritiks === | === Responding to Kritiks === | ||
There are a standard set of arguments you should know when responding to kritiks from a policy aff. These responses range from giving reasons why working within political institutions are good to specific reasons why the kritik's alternative will fail. The [[Responding_to_Kritiks#Policy_vs_Ks|Policy vs Ks]] section explains more about responding to kritiks from a political perspective. | There are a standard set of arguments you should know when responding to kritiks from a policy aff. These responses range from giving reasons why working within political institutions are good to specific reasons why the kritik's alternative will fail. The [[Responding_to_Kritiks#Policy_vs_Ks|Policy vs Ks]] section explains more about responding to kritiks from a political perspective. | ||