Content-Manager, Administrators
203
edits
Difference between revisions of "Prospect ST (Sophia Tian)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Prospect ST (Sophia Tian) (view source)
Revision as of 15:56, 9 October 2023
, 15:56, 9 October 2023no edit summary
CheeseMeese (talk | contribs) (→ACs) |
CheeseMeese (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Wiki stalking is going to be your best friend, especially if you don't do policy -- phil and K links can be easily acquired and used whenever you want as long as you're not at the first tournament of the topic. | Wiki stalking is going to be your best friend, especially if you don't do policy -- phil and K links can be easily acquired and used whenever you want as long as you're not at the first tournament of the topic. | ||
== Docs == | == Docs == | ||
Here are all the positions I read -- I mostly included things I cut myself with topic-specific frontlines. Any policy position I read was likely cut by Elmer Yang or stolen off the wiki. I rarely actually used prewritten frontlines -- writing them was just so I could think about them through and articulate my thoughts. | Here are all the positions I read -- I mostly included things I cut myself with topic-specific frontlines. Any policy position I read was likely cut by Elmer Yang or Samantha McLoughlin or stolen off the wiki. I rarely actually used prewritten frontlines -- writing them was just so I could think about them through and articulate my thoughts. | ||
[https://opencaselist.com/hsld22/Prospect/SoTi HSLD 2022--2023] | [https://opencaselist.com/hsld22/Prospect/SoTi HSLD 2022--2023] | ||
| Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
# Property rights can only be guaranteed by the state. | # Property rights can only be guaranteed by the state. | ||
# Thus, a state is necessary. | # Thus, a state is necessary. | ||
The environmentalism offense leveraged the idea that destroying the environment creates a contradiction in conception: if property rights are used to control resources but those resources are all destroyed in the process of exercising those property rights, there is no property in the first place to declare your rights over (e.g., say I overfish every day to increase my fish haul -- that kills all the fish and then I cannot achieve my original aim of getting more fish since they are all dead). This was probably my favorite framework. | The environmentalism offense leveraged the idea that destroying the environment creates a contradiction in conception: if property rights are used to control resources but those resources are all destroyed in the process of exercising those property rights, there is no property in the first place to declare your rights over (e.g., say I overfish every day to increase my fish haul -- that kills all the fish and then I cannot achieve my original aim of getting more fish since they are all dead). This was probably my favorite framework. (October 2023 addendum: no longer my favorite framework -- it's SeptOct 2023 now). | ||
[[:File:Prospect ST - ND22 Kant AC.docx|ND22 -- Kant AC]] | [[:File:Prospect ST - ND22 Kant AC.docx|ND22 -- Kant AC]] | ||
ND22 -- Kant AC Frontlines | |||
===== NCs ===== | ===== NCs ===== | ||
Not the most viable NC, ran it mostly for the speaks thing I mentioned above. This was a lot less elegant than the AC -- it was more like Milton Friedman-esque "REEEE PROPERTY RIGHTS!" It relied on Locke's conception of property -- labor mixing -- which just says that when you put your labor into something then you own it. It would therefore be unjust for the government to tell you how you ought to use your property (e.g., imagine I forced you to buy certain foods with your money (a form of property) -- it would seem unfair). | Not the most viable NC, ran it mostly for the speaks thing I mentioned above. This was a lot less elegant than the AC -- it was more like Milton Friedman-esque "REEEE PROPERTY RIGHTS!" It relied on Locke's conception of property -- labor mixing -- which just says that when you put your labor into something then you own it. It would therefore be unjust for the government to tell you how you ought to use your property (e.g., imagine I forced you to buy certain foods with your money (a form of property) -- it would seem unfair). | ||
ND22 -- Kant NC | |||
ND22 -- Kant NC Frontlines | |||
I read this NC to troll -- pretty sure I stole this from Valley but thought it was worth including. | I read this NC to troll -- pretty sure I stole this from Valley but thought it was worth including. | ||
| Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
[[:File:Prospect ST -- SO22 Kant AC Frontlines.docx|SO22 -- Kant AC Frontlines]] | [[:File:Prospect ST -- SO22 Kant AC Frontlines.docx|SO22 -- Kant AC Frontlines]] | ||
===== NCs ===== | ===== NCs ===== | ||
My child, and the only policy position I will probably ever cut in my career. | My child, and the only policy position I will probably ever cut in my career. Inspired by DebateDrill's counterinterp to T-Singlepayer. | ||
[[:File:Prospect ST -- SO22 Telesurgery PIC.docx|SO22 -- Telesurgery PIC]] | [[:File:Prospect ST -- SO22 Telesurgery PIC.docx|SO22 -- Telesurgery PIC]] | ||