Content-Manager, Administrators
203
edits
CheeseMeese (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
=== Overview === | === Overview === | ||
Certain affirmatives will choose to not defend the topic in the form of a [[Non-topical Affirmatives|non-topical affirmative]]. These affirmatives will argue that defending the topic is itself problematic and provide an alternative reason why the judge should still vote for them. Non-topical affirmatives are typically rooted in critical literature and can be strategic since debaters can work through multiple topics to perfect their aff. | Certain affirmatives will choose to not defend the topic in the form of a [[Non-topical Affirmatives|non-topical affirmative]]. These affirmatives will argue that defending the topic is itself problematic and provide an alternative reason why the judge should still vote for them. Non-topical affirmatives are typically rooted in critical literature and can be strategic since debaters can work through multiple topics to perfect their aff. | ||
== Critical Affirmatives == | |||
== Negating with Kritiks == | |||
== Critical Literature Bases == | == Critical Literature Bases == | ||
There are a core set of literature bases that are used in LD read both on the affirmative and negative side, categorized below. | There are a core set of literature bases that are used in LD read both on the affirmative and negative side, categorized below. |