1,166
edits
Millburn ST (talk | contribs) m (changed a bit of wording) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Overview == | |||
Pettit, or non-domination, is a philosophical framework read in debate. It asserts that the condition of being subject to the arbitrary will of another agent is unjust, even if the other agent does not actually violate one’s rights. Pettit is a comparatively intuitive and straightforward framework, making it viable in both traditional and circuit debate. | Pettit, or non-domination, is a philosophical framework read in debate. It asserts that the condition of being subject to the arbitrary will of another agent is unjust, even if the other agent does not actually violate one’s rights. Pettit is a comparatively intuitive and straightforward framework, making it viable in both traditional and circuit debate. | ||
== Syllogism == | == Syllogism == |