1,166
edits
Difference between revisions of "Tricks"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Common Substantive Tricks
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
[[Truth Testing]] and [[a Prioris]] are two arguments that when combined together show why the resolution is inherently true or false. These are perhaps the most common substantive tricks. | [[Truth Testing]] and [[a Prioris]] are two arguments that when combined together show why the resolution is inherently true or false. These are perhaps the most common substantive tricks. | ||
[[Permissibility Triggers]] are arguments that prove one debater's framework triggers [[Presumption and Permissibility#Permissibility|permissibility]], which is equivalent to proving that their framework fails to generate moral obligations. These arguments often take the form of a calc indict, a philosophical reason why a framework fails. | [[Permissibility Triggers]] are arguments that prove one debater's framework triggers [[Presumption and Permissibility#Permissibility|permissibility]], which is equivalent to proving that their framework fails to generate moral obligations or prohibitions. These arguments often take the form of a calc indict, a philosophical reason why a framework fails. | ||
[[Presumption Triggers]] are arguments that attempt to invalidate all substantive-based offense in the round so that [[Presumption and Permissibility#Presumption|presumption]] becomes relevant. | |||
[[Indexicals]] is an argument that argues the affirmative should get the ballot if there is ''any'' framework under which the affirmative is moral. | [[Indexicals]] is an argument that argues the affirmative should get the ballot if there is ''any'' framework under which the affirmative is moral. | ||