1,166
edits
Difference between revisions of "Tricks"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Substantive Tricks
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Tricks, broadly speaking, are debate arguments that are abusive and difficult to respond to. Tricky arguments are usually abusive either because they are hidden and intended for you to concede or because they are logically difficult to rebut. Tricky arguments are usually intended to provide a short and easy path to the ballot for the debater reading them, which is to say they are especially dangerous when conceded. Tricks can be strategic if you have a judge willing to evaluate such arguments, if you are more technically proficient than your opponent, or if you know your opponent is inexperienced at responding to tricks. When running tricks, however, you run the risk of heaving [[theory]] or [[kritiks]] read against you that criticize your practice. | Tricks, broadly speaking, are debate arguments that are abusive and difficult to respond to. Tricky arguments are usually abusive either because they are hidden and intended for you to concede or because they are logically difficult to rebut. Tricky arguments are usually intended to provide a short and easy path to the ballot for the debater reading them, which is to say they are especially dangerous when conceded. Tricks can be strategic if you have a judge willing to evaluate such arguments, if you are more technically proficient than your opponent, or if you know your opponent is inexperienced at responding to tricks. When running tricks, however, you run the risk of heaving [[theory]] or [[kritiks]] read against you that criticize your practice. | ||
== Substantive Tricks == | == Substantive Tricks == | ||
Substantive tricks attempt to win the substantive layer of debate. Many substantive tricks apply to the philosophical framework in round. | Substantive tricks attempt to win the substantive layer of debate. Many substantive tricks apply to the philosophical framework in round. | ||
[[Truth Testing]] and [[A priori|a Prioris]] are two arguments that when combined together show why the resolution is inherently true or false. These are perhaps the most common substantive tricks. | [[Truth Testing]] and [[A priori|a Prioris]] are two arguments that when combined together show why the resolution is inherently true or false. These are perhaps the most common substantive tricks. | ||