Difference between revisions of "Structure of a Shell"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 16: Line 16:
An example of an interpretation is “Interp: Debaters must not run conditional advocacies” which criticizes the use of [[conditional]] advocacies in the round.  
An example of an interpretation is “Interp: Debaters must not run conditional advocacies” which criticizes the use of [[conditional]] advocacies in the round.  


Interps for non-[[paragraph theory]] should be constructed with an actor (typically “debaters”) and should contain words like “must” instead of “should” or “ought.”
Interps for non-[[1AR Theory#Paragraph vs. “Traditional” Theory|paragraph theory]] should be constructed with an actor (typically “debaters”) and should contain words like “must” instead of “should” or “ought.”


Violations are reasons why your opponent fails to meet your interp.
Violations are reasons why your opponent fails to meet your interp.
Content-Manager, Administrators
209

edits

Navigation menu