Content-Manager, Administrators
209
edits
Difference between revisions of "Structure of a Shell"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→RVIs/No RVIs
CheeseMeese (talk | contribs) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
CheeseMeese (talk | contribs) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
RVIs – reciprocity – if they can win on a shell, I should also be able to win on it. | RVIs – reciprocity – if they can win on a shell, I should also be able to win on it. | ||
RVIs – time skew – RVIs compensate for the time I spend responding to your shells. Otherwise, you can infinitely uplayer. | RVIs – time skew – RVIs compensate for the time I spend responding to your shells. Otherwise, you can infinitely uplayer. | ||
RVIs – prevents frivolous theory – if you know you can’t lose, then you’re less likely to run frivolous shells that you could lose on. Allows us to focus on substance. | RVIs – prevents frivolous theory – if you know you can’t lose, then you’re less likely to run frivolous shells that you could lose on. Allows us to focus on substance. | ||
No RVIs – RVIs chill theory because people will be too afraid to report abuse if they believe they can be punished for it. | No RVIs – RVIs chill theory because people will be too afraid to report abuse if they believe they can be punished for it. | ||
No RVIs – it’s illogical – you shouldn’t win the round for being fair. | No RVIs – it’s illogical – you shouldn’t win the round for being fair. | ||
No RVIs – topic ed – if there’s no RVI, we can go back to substance which outweighs since we only have two months to discuss the topic, but if there are RVIs then we’ll always have theory debates. | No RVIs – topic ed – if there’s no RVI, we can go back to substance which outweighs since we only have two months to discuss the topic, but if there are RVIs then we’ll always have theory debates. | ||