Content-Manager, Administrators
203
edits
Difference between revisions of "Structure of a Shell"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Common Standards
CheeseMeese (talk | contribs) |
CheeseMeese (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
'''Clash''' – Clash is an educational impact regarding how arguments are answered. A tactic that relied on hiding arguments in case and not disclosing them would avoid clash since it would prevent people from discussing and debating (“clashing with”) those arguments. Clash can be split up into two types: breadth and depth. Breadth is about debating a large variety of arguments while depth is about closely debating one argument. Breadth and depth are also sometimes used to justify '''Limits.''' | '''Clash''' – Clash is an educational impact regarding how arguments are answered. A tactic that relied on hiding arguments in case and not disclosing them would avoid clash since it would prevent people from discussing and debating (“clashing with”) those arguments. Clash can be split up into two types: breadth and depth. Breadth is about debating a large variety of arguments while depth is about closely debating one argument. Breadth and depth are also sometimes used to justify '''Limits.''' | ||
'''Critical Thinking''' – Critical thinking is an educational skill about how fast someone can think on their feet. This is typically used to justify other skews like '''Strat/Time Skew.''' For example, strat skew can be turned by saying that it promotes critical thinking, which is better for debaters since they learn more in the long term. | '''Critical Thinking''' – Critical thinking is an educational skill about how fast someone can think on their feet. This is typically used to justify abuse from other skews like '''Strat/Time Skew.''' For example, strat skew can be turned by saying that it promotes critical thinking, which is better for debaters since they learn more in the long term. | ||
'''Real World''' – Real world education says that an argument is good if it models the real world. For example, arguing for multiple different advocacies could be real world since policymakers propose many different types of bills. | '''Real World''' – Real world education says that an argument is good if it models the real world. For example, arguing for multiple different advocacies could be real world since policymakers propose many different types of bills. | ||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
'''Shiftiness''' – Shiftiness is when people can be purposefully unclear about their stance on something in order to shift out of their original position to gain a strategic advantage. An example of shiftiness is lying in cross-ex or being intentionally vague of something. | '''Shiftiness''' – Shiftiness is when people can be purposefully unclear about their stance on something in order to shift out of their original position to gain a strategic advantage. An example of shiftiness is lying in cross-ex or being intentionally vague of something. | ||
==== Examples ==== | ==== Examples ==== | ||