Content-Manager
37
edits
Difference between revisions of "1AC Theory"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
CheeseMeese (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Often in the 1AC, many affs, particularly nailbomb affs, have long underviews–theoretical spikes used to pre-empt 1NC strategies. | Often in the 1AC, many affs, particularly nailbomb affs, have long underviews–theoretical spikes used to pre-empt 1NC strategies. | ||
An example of an underview can be found | An example of an underview can be found below–notice how there are lots of spikes at the bottom that if conceded, result in the aff immediately winning the round. | ||
These can be strategic because (1) Inefficient debaters would spend 2 minutes on a one minute under view because each blippy argument in the 1AC requires double the time to answer (2) Debaters are often caught off guard, resulting in a few game over spikes inevitably being conceded. | These can be strategic because (1) Inefficient debaters would spend 2 minutes on a one minute under view because each blippy argument in the 1AC requires double the time to answer (2) Debaters are often caught off guard, resulting in a few game over spikes inevitably being conceded. | ||