User contributions
19 January 2022
Scarsdale ZS
ACs
−32
Scarsdale ZS
ACs
+19
Philosophy
Terminology
−11
Main Page
no edit summary
Main Page
no edit summary
Library
no edit summary
+71
Main Page
no edit summary
+72
MediaWiki:Sitenotice
Blanked the page
−70
Kritiks
Identity Kritiks
Introduction to Circuit Debate
Spreading
−1
Library
Philosophy
+5
Topicality
Nebel (My Beloved) Topicality
−111
18 January 2022
Policy
Framing
+121
1AR Restart
Created page with "== Overview == The 1AR restart is a strategy where the affirmative chooses not to extend any of their 1AC into the 1AR, instead deriving entirely new offense by uplayering in the 1AR, which effectively "restarts" the debate in the 1AR. The 1AR restart can be strategic when the negative much further ahead on substance after the 1NC. Since the affirmative is reading entirely new layers and offense in the 1AR, the negative's only chance to respond will be in the 2NR, whic..."
File:JF21 - 1AR Restart.docx
Uploaded own work with UploadWizard
Skepticism Triggers
Example
+1
Skepticism Triggers
no edit summary
+462
Skepticism Triggers
Created page with "== Overview == Skepticism triggers prove that one debater's framework is necessary to avoid moral skepticism. More formally, a skepticism trigger ran by Debater <math>A</math> would argue that <math>A</math>'s framework is uniquely necessary to resolve moral skepticism, and if <math>A</math>'s framework were proven false, then moral skepticism must be true. Skepticism triggers can be strategic because they provide debaters with a backup route in th..."
Indexicals
Created page with "== Overview == Indexicals is an argument ran by the affirmative that claims if the resolution is true under any framework, that is sufficient to prove the truth of the resolution under truth testing. Importantly, this means that even if the negative wins their framework, if the affirmative's offense still functions under their own framework, that would be sufficient to win the debate substantively. Indexicals is clearly meant to be a trick,..."
Presumption Triggers
Created page with "== Overview == Presumption triggers are arguments that attempt to invalidate all offense in the round, causing presumption, so that the judge votes for one debater on presumption. Presumption triggers can be strategic if one debater is behind on contention-level offense, since they result in all offense becoming irrelevant. Additionally, it is not always obvious whether an argument is a presumption trigger until it is extend..."
Permissibility Triggers
Example
Permissibility Triggers
no edit summary
+432
Permissibility Triggers
no edit summary
+2,351
Permissibility and Presumption
Description
+28
Permissibility Triggers
Created page with "== Overview =="
Main Page
no edit summary
+299
Library
What is the Circuitdebater Library?
+19
MediaWiki:Sitenotice
no edit summary
Library
no edit summary
−61
MediaWiki:Sitenotice
no edit summary
+70
A Prioris
How To Respond
−1,089
Truth Testing
no edit summary
−167
Tricks
Common Theory Tricks
+17
Tricks
Description
+13
Intent-Foresight Distinction
Overview
+2,217
Intent-Foresight Distinction
no edit summary
+132
Act-Omission Distinction
Overview
+1
Act-Omission Distinction
Common Arguments
+870
Act-Omission Distinction
no edit summary
+1,427
Hijacks
no edit summary
+61
File:CD Hijack Example.docx
Uploaded own work with UploadWizard
Hijacks
Example
+1
Hijacks
no edit summary
+496
Tricks
Common Substantive Tricks
+211
Permissibility and Presumption
Presumption vs Permissibility
+1
Permissibility and Presumption
Presumption vs Permissibility
+573
Permissibility and Presumption
Description
+240
Permissibility and Presumption
Permissibility Affirms
+2,081
Permissibility and Presumption
Permissibility
+434
Permissibility and Presumption
Description
+1,556