1,166
edits
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Substantive tricks attempt to win the substantive layer of debate. Many substantive tricks apply to the philosophical framework in round. | Substantive tricks attempt to win the substantive layer of debate. Many substantive tricks apply to the philosophical framework in round. | ||
=== Common Substantive Tricks === | === Common Substantive Tricks === | ||
[[Truth Testing]] and [[ | [[Truth Testing]] and [[a Prioris]] are two arguments that when combined together show why the resolution is inherently true or false. These are perhaps the most common substantive tricks. | ||
[[Permissibility Triggers]] are arguments that prove one debater's framework triggers [[Presumption and Permissibility#Permissibility|permissibility]], which is equivalent to proving that their framework fails to generate moral obligations. These arguments often take the form of a calc indict, a philosophical reason why a framework fails. | [[Permissibility Triggers]] are arguments that prove one debater's framework triggers [[Presumption and Permissibility#Permissibility|permissibility]], which is equivalent to proving that their framework fails to generate moral obligations. These arguments often take the form of a calc indict, a philosophical reason why a framework fails. |