Difference between revisions of "Tricks"

9 bytes removed ,  05:23, 15 January 2022
Line 6: Line 6:
Substantive tricks attempt to win the substantive layer of debate. Many substantive tricks apply to the philosophical framework in round.  
Substantive tricks attempt to win the substantive layer of debate. Many substantive tricks apply to the philosophical framework in round.  
=== Common Substantive Tricks ===
=== Common Substantive Tricks ===
[[Truth Testing]] and [[A priori|a Prioris]] are two arguments that when combined together show why the resolution is inherently true or false. These are perhaps the most common substantive tricks.
[[Truth Testing]] and [[a Prioris]] are two arguments that when combined together show why the resolution is inherently true or false. These are perhaps the most common substantive tricks.


[[Permissibility Triggers]] are arguments that prove one debater's framework triggers [[Presumption and Permissibility#Permissibility|permissibility]], which is equivalent to proving that their framework fails to generate moral obligations. These arguments often take the form of a calc indict, a philosophical reason why a framework fails.
[[Permissibility Triggers]] are arguments that prove one debater's framework triggers [[Presumption and Permissibility#Permissibility|permissibility]], which is equivalent to proving that their framework fails to generate moral obligations. These arguments often take the form of a calc indict, a philosophical reason why a framework fails.