Difference between revisions of "Capitalism Kritik"

851 bytes added ,  03:53, 1 April 2023
Line 104: Line 104:
For example, take the 2021 NovDec LD topic “Resolved: A just government ought to recognize the unconditional right of workers to strike.” A Cap aff could say that if workers don’t have the right to strike, their employers can oppress them and force them to work for inhumane pay, causing capitalism by strengthening private owners.
For example, take the 2021 NovDec LD topic “Resolved: A just government ought to recognize the unconditional right of workers to strike.” A Cap aff could say that if workers don’t have the right to strike, their employers can oppress them and force them to work for inhumane pay, causing capitalism by strengthening private owners.
=== Responding to Capitalism ===
=== Responding to Capitalism ===
1. fw
Acronym:FPOSTAL


2. thesis defense
1. Framework-A common answer is:
We get to weigh the consequences of the Aff vs a competitive policy proposal or the status quo----Then standards.


3. link defense
2: Perms:


4. link turns
Common CP perms like Perm do both and Perm do the CP applies. A special one can be perm double bind, which is either the alt is strong and it can include the aff, or the alt is weak and it needs the aff. i.e. You can say that socialism is weak and need capitalist development to fuel the its economy.


5. impact turns (policy kids' dreams)
3: Offense:


6. alt bad/fails/co-opted
Good impact turns like Cap Good would be the most effective.  


7. perms
4: Theory:
 
Vague alts bad, Utopian alts bad, Condo, Floating PIKs(Plan inclusive Kritiks) bad are great.
 
5: Solvency:
 
Alt doesn't solve, i.e. a communist society can't solve for emissions required for industrial civilization. Alt fails cards are key.
 
6: Alt bad:
 
Talk about how the alt creates problems, i.e. communism transforms into police states easily, causes more conflict. Empirics of USSR.
 
7: Link:
 
No link args.