1,166
edits
Difference between revisions of "Virtue Ethics"
→Virtue Ethics
(Created page with "== Virtue Ethics == Virtue ethics is another important framework in debate. Typically, frameworks can be split into three categories: deontological, consequentialist, and aret...") |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Many people wonder how these virtues are generated or justified. One common response is that virtue have become apparent due to the intrinsic features of humanity. For instance, humans are naturally social creatures since we work together, which is why communities are valued, or we need to survive, which is why bravery is valued. In the context of debate, it is often beneficial to find a card, or justification, for each virtue used that explains why that particular virtue is important and might outweigh other virtues. | Many people wonder how these virtues are generated or justified. One common response is that virtue have become apparent due to the intrinsic features of humanity. For instance, humans are naturally social creatures since we work together, which is why communities are valued, or we need to survive, which is why bravery is valued. In the context of debate, it is often beneficial to find a card, or justification, for each virtue used that explains why that particular virtue is important and might outweigh other virtues. | ||
=== Readings === | === Readings === | ||
[https://philpapers.org/rec/GRYOTR Gryz, On the Relationship Between the Aretaic and the Deontic] | |||
[https://jmt.scholasticahq.com/article/11282-after-white-supremacy-the-viability-of-virtue-ethics-for-racial-justice O'Connell, After White Supremacy? The Viability of Virtue Ethics for Racial Justice] | |||
=== Sample Cases === | === Sample Cases === | ||
[[Media:JF21 - AC - Virtue Ethics.docx|JF21 - AC - Virtue Ethics.docx]] | |||