Difference between revisions of "Philosophy"

Phil debate is largely strategic for three reasons. Firstly, many philosophical positions are strategic against [[utilitarianism]], one of the most common frameworks read in LD. Proficient phil debaters can become very adept at answering util, making it very difficult for their opponents to get recourse. Secondly, many debaters don't understand the nuances of phil debate and as a result, struggle to properly defend their framework against objections. Thirdly, philosophical frameworks provide an alternative way to answering kritiks, and as a result, many K debaters, used to answering policy, are less prepared to defend their positions against phil.  

== Structure of Frameworks ==

  This section is under construction.

== Common Philosophies ==

[[Utilitarianism]] is likely the most common framework read in LD. Used as the framework for [[policy]] positions, utilitarian frameworks center around maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain.  

[[Pettit]]

== Other Concepts ==

[[Act-Omission Distinction]]

[[Presumption and Permissibility]]